<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Spend Some Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html</link>
	<description>My journey to working from home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-689</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 21:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-689</guid>
		<description>He mentioned it was really something they did for the bigger packages just because the link profile looks skewed.

(Oh, 1,000 profile links *don&#039;t* look funny?)

I&#039;m all for BP...just $$$ -- would have to be a major site or would have to be making some serious income.  Right now, this is a well-paying hobby for me looking at the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He mentioned it was really something they did for the bigger packages just because the link profile looks skewed.</p>
<p>(Oh, 1,000 profile links *don&#8217;t* look funny?)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for BP&#8230;just $$$ &#8212; would have to be a major site or would have to be making some serious income.  Right now, this is a well-paying hobby for me looking at the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Ahhh. Thanks James, I hadn&#039;t seen John&#039;s comments on Sara&#039;s blog. Now I understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh. Thanks James, I hadn&#8217;t seen John&#8217;s comments on Sara&#8217;s blog. Now I understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 21:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Ah - you should read Sara&#039;s post on the update for the 400 BP trial she&#039;s doing -- I&#039;m pretty sure you read/commented there and no, I&#039;m not stalking -- anyhow, John Dale (Daley?) of BP mentioned that he had created some Web 2.0 properties for Sara on one of her sites for which they were creating the 400 profile links.

He had an interesting observation, which tells me he&#039;s the real deal, that they had to create various Web 2.0 properties for her site to give the site a varied backlinking profile.

Otherwise, he says the link juice from the profile backlinks goes down.  So, a variety of links = more success, can&#039;t have all the eggs in one basket per se.

Social Bookmarks
Profile links
Blog Comments
Articles
Web 2.0 Sites...

Mix it up and your link juice has more vitamin &quot;L.&quot;  for...&quot;link...&quot;  hm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah &#8211; you should read Sara&#8217;s post on the update for the 400 BP trial she&#8217;s doing &#8212; I&#8217;m pretty sure you read/commented there and no, I&#8217;m not stalking &#8212; anyhow, John Dale (Daley?) of BP mentioned that he had created some Web 2.0 properties for Sara on one of her sites for which they were creating the 400 profile links.</p>
<p>He had an interesting observation, which tells me he&#8217;s the real deal, that they had to create various Web 2.0 properties for her site to give the site a varied backlinking profile.</p>
<p>Otherwise, he says the link juice from the profile backlinks goes down.  So, a variety of links = more success, can&#8217;t have all the eggs in one basket per se.</p>
<p>Social Bookmarks<br />
Profile links<br />
Blog Comments<br />
Articles<br />
Web 2.0 Sites&#8230;</p>
<p>Mix it up and your link juice has more vitamin &#8220;L.&#8221;  for&#8230;&#8221;link&#8230;&#8221;  hm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Grammar errors again! Sorry!!

EDIT: I&#039;m a moron. Just realized I can edit my comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammar errors again! Sorry!!</p>
<p>EDIT: I&#8217;m a moron. Just realized I can edit my comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-685</guid>
		<description>James, we end up chatting on your blogging and commenting on the same other blogs so I can&#039;t keep things straight myself. No worries.

But you have confused me again. What does Web2.0Bot have to do with BP? I think of BP as doing forum and profile links whereas I thought WebBot submitted article to Web2.0 sites like Squidoo, etc. I&#039;m missing the conncetion.

When you have time, I&#039;m here :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, we end up chatting on your blogging and commenting on the same other blogs so I can&#8217;t keep things straight myself. No worries.</p>
<p>But you have confused me again. What does Web2.0Bot have to do with BP? I think of BP as doing forum and profile links whereas I thought WebBot submitted article to Web2.0 sites like Squidoo, etc. I&#8217;m missing the conncetion.</p>
<p>When you have time, I&#8217;m here <img src='http://www.workingtowardshome.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-684</guid>
		<description>I thought I read a comment of yours on Passive Income Online (Michelle&#039;s) re: a VA -- don&#039;t worry about being confused, it&#039;s all me: 60 hours at day job +45 and counting online = .... :/  ?!

The Web20Bot is working on my end - it&#039;s the first edition, though, so it&#039;ll be a bit glitchy first, but with the new submission engine it seems to work fine.

Judging from what John is doing  at Backlink P.I., building the web 2.0&#039;s works -- and simplifies the process w/Incansoft.

Anyhoo, sorry for being a bugger.  Gotta run like Forrest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I read a comment of yours on Passive Income Online (Michelle&#8217;s) re: a VA &#8212; don&#8217;t worry about being confused, it&#8217;s all me: 60 hours at day job +45 and counting online = &#8230;. :/  ?!</p>
<p>The Web20Bot is working on my end &#8211; it&#8217;s the first edition, though, so it&#8217;ll be a bit glitchy first, but with the new submission engine it seems to work fine.</p>
<p>Judging from what John is doing  at Backlink P.I., building the web 2.0&#8242;s works &#8212; and simplifies the process w/Incansoft.</p>
<p>Anyhoo, sorry for being a bugger.  Gotta run like Forrest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Ok, lots of grammatical errors in that last comment, but I think my drift can be caught? I type slower than I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, lots of grammatical errors in that last comment, but I think my drift can be caught? I type slower than I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 20:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-682</guid>
		<description>James, you have me so confused now. I was referring to MS, but in past tense. I was thinking of buying BEFORE I knew the price tag. Had it been a one-time $97 I would have considered it, but I don&#039;t need it enough to pay the monthly or yearly fee. 

Yeah, I had the Web2.0 bot but Incansoft is so hit or miss I figured it&#039;s probably just easier to stick with manual. Don&#039;t do that much there either. 

Oh, and don&#039;t have a VA. Not sure if that question was directed to me or not but answered anyway :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, you have me so confused now. I was referring to MS, but in past tense. I was thinking of buying BEFORE I knew the price tag. Had it been a one-time $97 I would have considered it, but I don&#8217;t need it enough to pay the monthly or yearly fee. </p>
<p>Yeah, I had the Web2.0 bot but Incansoft is so hit or miss I figured it&#8217;s probably just easier to stick with manual. Don&#8217;t do that much there either. </p>
<p>Oh, and don&#8217;t have a VA. Not sure if that question was directed to me or not but answered anyway <img src='http://www.workingtowardshome.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Yeah.  Meant to say &quot;I&#039;m pretty excited.&quot;  ha ha...dork!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  Meant to say &#8220;I&#8217;m pretty excited.&#8221;  ha ha&#8230;dork!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/lets-spend-some-money.html/comment-page-1#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=218#comment-679</guid>
		<description>Carrie -

My bad, I thought that&#039;s what you were referring to - did you get the email re: Web20Bot from Incansoft?  

Creates Web 2.0 properties and dirt cheap -- it&#039;s not available from their catalog yet, but that thing seems to work just fine.

I bought it when I got the email for $14.95, if you didn&#039;t get the email I&#039;ll send you the link.  And no, I&#039;m not an aff for them!

:)  

I just realized how tacky that seemed, btw, and I really thought you were referring to MS which is why I brought it up.  I pretty excited about the web 2.0 stuff: reading Sara&#039;s comments from John Dale (BLP) is interesting: building the web 2.0 for her site and the links showing up.

Vewwy intewesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carrie -</p>
<p>My bad, I thought that&#8217;s what you were referring to &#8211; did you get the email re: Web20Bot from Incansoft?  </p>
<p>Creates Web 2.0 properties and dirt cheap &#8212; it&#8217;s not available from their catalog yet, but that thing seems to work just fine.</p>
<p>I bought it when I got the email for $14.95, if you didn&#8217;t get the email I&#8217;ll send you the link.  And no, I&#8217;m not an aff for them!</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.workingtowardshome.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   </p>
<p>I just realized how tacky that seemed, btw, and I really thought you were referring to MS which is why I brought it up.  I pretty excited about the web 2.0 stuff: reading Sara&#8217;s comments from John Dale (BLP) is interesting: building the web 2.0 for her site and the links showing up.</p>
<p>Vewwy intewesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

