<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free Traffic System &#8211; Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html</link>
	<description>My journey to working from home</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:54:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 13:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>I am using Seolinkvine now a say which  is giving better service compare to free traffic system. But, a little problem is that it is a paid service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using Seolinkvine now a say which  is giving better service compare to free traffic system. But, a little problem is that it is a paid service.<br />
<span class="cluv">John recently posted..<a class="8f7e4a63b0 1833" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.firewirecamera.org/2010/12/firewire-camera.html">Firewire Camera</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 04:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Nice suggestion. Yeah, I get tons of pingbacks that I never see show up in google, so any tool that works with indexing those would be great. I&#039;ll see if I can find it online...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice suggestion. Yeah, I get tons of pingbacks that I never see show up in google, so any tool that works with indexing those would be great. I&#8217;ll see if I can find it online&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamestheJust on Elance</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>JamestheJust on Elance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 04:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-583</guid>
		<description>Great tips as usual, Michelle.  I was going to suggest a tool someone else suggested -- I want to buy it soon, haven&#039;t yet, just read about it -- called the &quot;Indexing Tool,&quot; a WP plugin.

It works by indexing your backlinks: articles and such, that send trackbacks to your WP site.  The trackbacks don&#039;t all show up in YSE, so they don&#039;t seem to count as link votes -- so this plugin works to get those particular pages indexed in G, then the links count...

I&#039;ve just bought Magic Article Rewriter and won&#039;t be buying another IM tool until I get my Elance gig done (a major client), so I haven&#039;t bought the plugin -- but it would work with article submissions.

The creator, Paul something or other, uses it to index his UAW articles.  Anyway, just food for thought for getting more link juice.

I&#039;ll be buying that tool and then testing it out.  Until then, take this as food for thought, as I can&#039;t vouch for its effectiveness...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips as usual, Michelle.  I was going to suggest a tool someone else suggested &#8212; I want to buy it soon, haven&#8217;t yet, just read about it &#8212; called the &#8220;Indexing Tool,&#8221; a WP plugin.</p>
<p>It works by indexing your backlinks: articles and such, that send trackbacks to your WP site.  The trackbacks don&#8217;t all show up in YSE, so they don&#8217;t seem to count as link votes &#8212; so this plugin works to get those particular pages indexed in G, then the links count&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just bought Magic Article Rewriter and won&#8217;t be buying another IM tool until I get my Elance gig done (a major client), so I haven&#8217;t bought the plugin &#8212; but it would work with article submissions.</p>
<p>The creator, Paul something or other, uses it to index his UAW articles.  Anyway, just food for thought for getting more link juice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be buying that tool and then testing it out.  Until then, take this as food for thought, as I can&#8217;t vouch for its effectiveness&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 15:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve done that and it works fine. I&#039;ll often submit to FTS first, and then to articlebot or a similar article submission system that allows spinning. If you use thebestspinner, I believe you can easily change the spin tags. Otherwise &quot;search and replace&quot; works well and is very quick too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve done that and it works fine. I&#8217;ll often submit to FTS first, and then to articlebot or a similar article submission system that allows spinning. If you use thebestspinner, I believe you can easily change the spin tags. Otherwise &#8220;search and replace&#8221; works well and is very quick too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-580</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 10:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-580</guid>
		<description>Thanks again Michelle. If they would give a reason for rejection that would be helpful. Perhaps I&#039;ll spin a new article and submit to FTS first and post to article directories. I&#039;d still like to see how far I can get with one article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again Michelle. If they would give a reason for rejection that would be helpful. Perhaps I&#8217;ll spin a new article and submit to FTS first and post to article directories. I&#8217;d still like to see how far I can get with one article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-578</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 01:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-578</guid>
		<description>My articles were all original, so that may be the key with the high acceptance rate I&#039;ve had overall. Still, I have to say I was bummed about the two articles rejected - they do take abit of time to put together, and they won&#039;t accept them later once they have been rejected - even if you correct any mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My articles were all original, so that may be the key with the high acceptance rate I&#8217;ve had overall. Still, I have to say I was bummed about the two articles rejected &#8211; they do take abit of time to put together, and they won&#8217;t accept them later once they have been rejected &#8211; even if you correct any mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 17:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Thanks Michelle. Were all your accepted articles original or had the been published elsewhere already (like EZA)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michelle. Were all your accepted articles original or had the been published elsewhere already (like EZA)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.workingtowardshome.com/free-traffic-system-comments.html/comment-page-1#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 16:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workingtowardshome.com/?p=193#comment-575</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using FTS for a while, and I do think it is worth the effort. I&#039;ve only had two articles rejected out of about 50 submissions so far. With both of those articles, there was a mistake made in the spin syntax, so that may have been the issue. However, they were both also product related, e.g. &quot;How Best to Select an Electric Washing Machine&quot; type articles - so maybe they were rejected as too promotional... I haven&#039;t had any problem with those articles that were more general in information, e.g. &quot;Tips for Writing a Great Article&quot; and had perfect spun syntax.

In terms of results, I do find that about 1/3 of the blog links show up in YSE, although probably only half of those stick. I believe there has been some boost on the sites as a result of these links. I think that considering it&#039;s a free service, the results are OK, although I&#039;m now starting to branch out to different blog networks as I think the FTS system may be a bit too saturated. Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using FTS for a while, and I do think it is worth the effort. I&#8217;ve only had two articles rejected out of about 50 submissions so far. With both of those articles, there was a mistake made in the spin syntax, so that may have been the issue. However, they were both also product related, e.g. &#8220;How Best to Select an Electric Washing Machine&#8221; type articles &#8211; so maybe they were rejected as too promotional&#8230; I haven&#8217;t had any problem with those articles that were more general in information, e.g. &#8220;Tips for Writing a Great Article&#8221; and had perfect spun syntax.</p>
<p>In terms of results, I do find that about 1/3 of the blog links show up in YSE, although probably only half of those stick. I believe there has been some boost on the sites as a result of these links. I think that considering it&#8217;s a free service, the results are OK, although I&#8217;m now starting to branch out to different blog networks as I think the FTS system may be a bit too saturated. Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

